Create your account

600 free respondents. About four studies. No credit card.

Use your work Google account. Personal addresses like Gmail aren’t accepted.

600 free respondents. No credit card. Cancel nothing. There’s nothing to cancel.

By continuing you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy.

Illustrative study result

Homepage headline comparison
Two separately run matched arms

Message A · “Empowering workflows”Mean 3.2 / 5

1–5 PMF: 8% · 18% · 34% · 26% · 14%
Conservative interval (95%): 2.8–3.6
Precision-of-the-mean interval (95%): 3.1–3.3

Message B · “Automate manual data entry”Mean 3.8 / 5

1–5 PMF: 3% · 9% · 23% · 35% · 30%
Conservative interval (95%): 3.4–4.2
Precision-of-the-mean interval (95%): 3.7–3.9

Simulation precision, not accuracy about real buyers.

Simulated buyer reaction · illustrative
“I understand what gets automated; I would still need the setup steps made concrete.”

Example only · not a customer result

Compare the 1–5 means, full spread, intervals, and generated reactions together.

Too close to call is reported as no clear winner, never rounded up.

Directional evidence. Strongest for comparing options and surfacing objections. B2B accuracy has not been separately established.